ICAR - SUGARCANE BREEDING INSTITUTE
COIMBATORE 641 007
Call for Papers : 17th meeting of Sugarcane R&D Workers of Northern Karnataka - Belagavi;
16-17 September, 2016
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
GENERAL
CIRCULAR - I
Dear
Sir/Ma’am,
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore
in collaboration with University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, S.Nijalingappa
Sugar Institute, Belagavi and the sugar
industries of Northern Karnataka would be organizing the 17th meeting of Sugarcane Research
and Development workers of Northern Karnataka during September 16-17, 2016 in the premises of S.Nijalingappa Sugar Institute, Belagavi to discuss the following
topics:
·
Review
of action taken on the recommendations of the previous meeting
·
Pest
management in Sugarcane including White grubs
· Managing saline-alkali
soils
· Varietal position in sugar
factories
·
Performance
of new sugarcane varieties & AICRP
(S) Varietal trials
·
Sugarcane
seed nursery programme
Besides these, there will be a general
interactive session before the plenary session on the second day and a
special lecture on Micro
Irrigation and Fertigation in Sugarcane.
S.Nijalingappa
Sugar Institute, Shri Prabulingeshwar Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. and Gem Sugars Ltd., would be jointly hosting the meeting.
You are
cordially invited to attend this meeting along with your colleagues and
participate in the deliberations. Manuscripts of the papers covering these
topics may please be prepared as per the guidelines enclosed and send the same
to the undersigned by August 26, 2016. The guidelines can also be
downloaded from www.sugarcane.res.in or www.caneinfo.nic.in .
As we
are planning to bring out the papers presented at the meeting in printed form (Compendium of Research Articles & Status
Papers; ISSN: 0973-8185), your papers may be prepared and sent to the
undersigned in time. The papers (prepared using MS Word 2003) can be sent by email to sbiextension@yahoo.com. Presentations,
created in Microsoft PowerPoint 2003/2007 format (.ppt/.pptx), should fit
within the allotted time in the Technical sessions.
With kind regards,
Yours sincerely,
Sd/-
DIRECTOR
_________________________________________________________________
Telephone Nos: Office:
EPBX: 0422- 2472621 Extn : 238, 2472986 (Thro'PA) Fax:
0422-2472923
GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING PAPERS
Topic i :
Review of action taken on the recommendations of the previous meeting
Sugar factories/Cane commissionerate/Department
of Agriculture and research institutions are requested to furnish the details
of action taken on the recommendations made in the previous meeting as per the
details given hereunder:
S.No
|
Recommendation/Action
point
|
Action
taken
|
1.
|
Sugar
factories in Northern Karnataka region should come forward to send Status
reports and Action Taken Reports in time.
|
|
2.
|
Sugar
factories should study the effect of harvesters and other machinery on soil
compaction on a long term basis
|
|
3.
|
The
possibility of legalization of the deduction for extraneous matter in
mechanical harvesting of cane in the Sugarcane (Control) Order 1966 should be
considered (Cane Commissionerate/Department of Agriculture, Govt. of
Karnataka)
|
|
4.
|
Popularizing
sugarcane mechanization including inter cultural operations and harvesting
among the growers by sugar factories
|
|
5.
|
Research
on intercropping in sugarcane should be holistic in nature. Before choosing
intercrops, the factories should work out the economics, adaptive behaviour
of the intercrop to the local conditions and local marketing facilities and
then recommend.
|
|
6.
|
Wide row
planting of sugarcane has to be promoted by factories for encouraging inter-cropping
and mechanized harvesting.
|
|
7.
|
Agronomical
techniques such as Raised bed / FIRB (Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed) methods
should be modified and promoted among farmers by the factories.
|
|
8.
|
In
addition to Co 86032, new varieties/pre-release promising clones should be
evaluated and a varietal composition of 4-5 varieties should be maintained by
the factories.
|
|
9.
|
A large
gap between potential yield and average yield has been observed from the
status reports. When the mean yield of a particular variety is below 60 % of
its potential yield, it should be replaced with suitable varieties procured
and evaluated from ARS, Sankeshwar and ICAR-SBI, Coimbatore.
|
|
10.
|
Before
introducing any new/unknown variety in the region, ICAR-SBI, Coimbatore or
ARS, Sankeshwar should be consulted.
|
|
11.
|
As data on
varietal status in sugar factories is vital, all factories in Northern
Karnataka should send their status reports on varietal position in the
factory areas in time for inclusion in the Compendium.
|
|
12.
|
Based on
the experimental evidence, it is recommended to conduct co-ordinated
evaluation of potential varieties. ICAR-SBI, Coimbatore in collaboration with
ARS, Sankeshwar and SNSI, Belgaum may co-ordinate the trials in select
factory locations in Northern Karnataka. The modalities need to be worked
out. (ICAR-SBI, ARS, Sankeshwar/SNSI)
|
|
13.
|
The 3-tier nursery programme should be rigorously
followed by all the sugar factories to maintain genetic purity and sustain
productivity.
|
|
14.
|
Factories should send feedback on the performance of
the seed material lifted from research institutions. A database on this
information should be maintained by both the research institutions as well as
sugar factories.
|
|
15.
|
DUS characters of
different varieties of sugarcane that are available will be made available by
ICAR-SBI for use by sugar factories. (ICAR-SBI)
|
|
Topic ii: Pest management in
Sugarcane including White grubs
Major pests and their
general distribution in different divisions of factory area and occurrence of
hot spots - Succession of pests in a single crop and general seasonal pattern
in the crop zone - Localized pest outbreaks in presumable hot spot areas - General
crop losses due to pests - Pest monitoring and damage assessment programme
currently adopted
Prophylactic and curative
strategies planned and adopted for pest management - Routine cultural practices
adopted and the pest control advantages experienced - Mechanical methods
adopted, if any, and constraints faced -
Biological control strategies adopted: calendar or need based adoption;
constraints of availability and efficiency - Status of chemical control: major
pests targeted, chemicals used, preventive or curative approach adopted -
Status of integrated pest management program for major pests – Steps taken in
monitoring of seed material movement and quarantine to prevent spread of pests
- Efforts taken in dissemination of improved pest management practices.
Factories may
provide details in the following format:
i.
Status of pests in the
factory area
|
||||||
Pest category
|
Name of pest
|
Status (Regular/
Occasional)
|
Extent of occurrence
(% area)
|
Field level incidence
(% attack) |
Extent of loss (Yield/
quality)
|
Major outbreak in the
last five years
|
Subterranean
pests
|
White
grubs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borers
|
Early
shoot borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internode
borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Root
borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sucking
pests
|
Woolly
aphid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitefly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale
insect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mealybug
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others,
if any
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
Status of pest management practices
|
||||||||||||
Pest
category
|
Name of
pest
|
Cultural
control
|
Mechanical
control
|
Biological
control
|
Chemical
control
|
IPM
|
Constraints
in adoption
|
|||||
Yes/No
|
Practice
adopted
|
Y/N
|
Practice
adopted
|
Y/N
|
Practice
adopted
|
Y/N
|
Practice
adopted
|
Y/N
|
Practice adopted
|
|||
Subterranean
pests
|
White
grubs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borers
|
Early shoot borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internode borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Root borer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sucking pests
|
Woolly aphid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitefly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale insect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mealybug
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others, if any
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic iii: Managing
saline-alkali soils
Extent
of saline soils in the factory command area; performance of sugarcane in saline
soils - yield obtained on normal soils vs yield obtained in saline soil;
management measures recommended - management measures adopted for saline soil
reclamation - leaching, organic manuring, green manuring, tolerant varieties etc.;
technologies recommended and adopted by farmers - sugarcane varieties
recommended for saline soils; extent of saline irrigation water - management
technologies for saline irrigation water.
Extent
of alkaline/sodic soils in the factory command area; performance of sugarcane
in alkaline soils - yield obtained in normal soils vs alkaline/sodic soils;
management measures recommended - management measures adopted for alkaline soil
reclamation - gypsum application and puddling, organic manuring, green
manuring, tolerant varieties etc. - technologies recommended for
alkaline soil management - sugarcane varieties suitable for alkaline soils;
extent of alkaline irrigation water - management technologies for alkaline
irrigation water.
Extension
efforts to disseminate reclamation/management measures for saline and alkaline
soils - common constraints faced by factory / farmers in adoption of management
measures - plan of action proposed for overcoming the constraints.
Factories may
provide details in the following format:
S.No.
|
Nature of soil
|
Total factory command area
(ha)
|
Cane area under
saline/alkaline soil (ha)
|
Mean cane yield in normal
soil (t/ha)
|
Mean cane yield in
saline/alkaline soil (t/ha)
|
Yield gap (t/ha)
|
1
|
Saline (ECe >4.0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Alkaline (pH >8.5; ESP >15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic iv: Varietal position
in sugar factories
Sugar factory personnel to provide the
following details:
2013-14
S.No
|
Variety
|
Area covered
|
Percentage
|
Average yield t/ha
|
Highest yield
t/ ha
|
Yield at the time of introduction (t/ha) (Mention
year)
|
Yield, at present (t/ha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-15
S.No
|
Variety
|
Area covered
|
Percentage
|
Average yield t/ha
|
Highest yield
t/ ha
|
Yield at the time of introduction (t/ha) (Mention
year)
|
Yield, at present (t/ha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-16
S.No
|
Variety
|
Area covered
|
Percentage
|
Average yield t/ha
|
Highest yield
t/ ha
|
Yield at the time of introduction (t/ha) (Mention
year)
|
Yield, at present (t/ha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic v: Performance of new sugarcane varieties
& AICRP (S) Varietal trials
Scientists from ICAR-Sugarcane
Breeding Institute, Coimbatore and Research Stations of Northern Karnataka
would be presenting the characteristics of new sugarcane variety and their
performance in Northern Karnataka. All
the participants may give their observations on the performance of new
varieties especially with reference to cane yield (average and highest yield
recorded) quality (including SMT and BMT results), performance in different
soil types and months of planting &optimum age at harvest. Incidence of pest and diseases, tolerance to
abiotic constraints such as drought, water-logging etc. may also be indicated.
The results of AICRP trials
conducted in Northern Karnataka would be presented.
Topic vi: Seed Nursery
Programme
Breeder seed production programme of
the Research stations of Northern Karnataka would be discussed. Sugar factories will present their seed
nursery programmes and indicate breeder seed requirements.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments and Suggestions
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.